Corporate innovators – engineers, marketers and sales professionals that desire to see their ideas come to life in an organization – face a wide range of obstacles when presenting new opportunities. Ultimately they must ask for support and funds in what I call the “executive inquisition.” In the process of preparing for this funding discussion, I see a range of common mistakes. Here is an extreme example based on a recent funding pitch I was in (the names and details have been modified to protect the guilty):
Aaron was a product manager for an educational software company. He was confident that virtual reality (VR) headsets were gaining traction with customers and was presenting an idea to develop virtual tours of historic sites. As the meeting started, Aaron handed each executive a VR headset as he explained how VR would open up a whole new market for richer educational and entertainment experiences. He smiled as everyone’s faces lit up, experiencing a sample virtual tour of Beijing’s Forbidden City. After the demonstration, Aaron pulled up a spreadsheet to present the numbers. “The tourism market to historic sites is a $220 billion global market opportunity. Last year, 14 million people spent an average of $1800 to visit the site you just toured from the comfort of your chair.
We expect virtual tours to be 5% of this market in 10 years and we think it’s possible to take 10% market share for a total potential revenue of $1.1 billion by 2025.” After a bit of silence, Beth, the COO, asked the first question, “Soo…customers are willing to pay $1,800 for a virtual tour?” Aaron paused. He looked at his math briefly. He knew that wasn’t possible, but that’s what his math said. Aaron backpedaled and attempted to explain that the market would still be big. Unfortunately, it was too late. The excitement in the room turned to confusion as each executive tried to find meaning in the numbers. Aaron was told to come back when he had more reasonable financial projections.
The common mistake here is that high-level numbers are presented, some magic happens, a result pops out, but there’s very little logic in the middle. Aaron needed to bridge the gap between the convincingly large size of the tourism market and the realistic potential of virtual tours. While this mistake is often related to market and revenue forecasts, it’s indicative of many mistakes I see innovators make.
Beyond this typical blunder of presenting unbelievable forecasts, here are the five most common mistakes I see innovators make:
#5) Asking for too many resources up front.
Most significant innovation that might generate $millions in new revenue and profit is going to require a significant investment… but at considerable risk. Few executives will see a large price tag as an acceptable risk without first learning more about the market, testing the technology or finding key customers. The easiest way for an executive to accept the larger investment is by asking for a small investment at first to lower the risk of future larger investments.
#4) Not matching the idea to corporate needs.
Big new markets and exciting new products are great, but if the ideas leading to these opportunities aren’t aligned with corporate needs then innovators just wasting their – and executive’s – time. All corporate opportunities should quickly be vetted based on the criteria that executives find important. These criteria usually come down to strategy, financial criteria and the company’s ability to leverage current assets.
#3) Failing to recognize the primary customer for their idea: The funding executive.
Even if you think the huge potential of your opportunity is obvious, and you have market data to prove it, funding executives will not agree with you until their needs are met – both personally and professionally. Success is based on understanding and meeting decision-makers’ needs. For example, some executives will need mass amounts of customer data to support your idea while others may need a clear execution plan.
#2) Not pre-selling ideas with decision-makers to get support.
Big decisions rarely happen in real time during big meetings. As any good politician will tell you, decisions for big, controversial laws are known well in advance of any formal voting. And the way they try to influence the outcome in their favor is by pre-selling the law in advance of any vote. Innovators must operate the same way and learn objections and solicit positive support well in advance of any formal meeting for a new opportunity.
#1) Focusing more on the technology or features of an idea than the market needs and data.
New ideas are intoxicating and it’s easy to get wrapped up in the cutting edge attributes of an innovative product. This excitement can energize initial discussions. Without quickly converting cool features into filled market needs and backing it up with data, enthusiasm will quickly wane as the discussion turns to a real debate on the idea as a business opportunity
All of these mistakes can be easily remedied by taking a focused approach with the company’s and funding executives’ needs in mind when preparing for the executive inquisition. This makes the big funding meeting feel less like an inquisition and more like an intelligent discussion of peers seeking common ground.
Do you have a good story of a funding request gone bad? Please share!
image credit: Haldane Martin
Wait! Before you go…
Choose how you want the latest innovation content delivered to you:
- Daily — RSS Feed — Email — Twitter — Facebook — Linkedin Today
- Weekly — Email Newsletter — Free Magazine — Linkedin Group
Dorian Simpson is an author, trainer and speaker on innovation topics and has been an executive with some of world’s most innovative companies from IBM to Motorola. He is currently the Managing Director of Planning Innovations and author of The Savvy Corporate Innovator. He can be found at www.planninginnovations.com.