Microsoft out-innovates Apple & Google

 Microsoft out-innovates Apple & Google In just 1 week, Microsoft out-innovated Apple and Google with their radical new business model

In just one week, Microsoft’s new CEO Satya Nadella has completely changed Microsoft’s business model operates. In the process, the new Microsoft has become more innovative and able to take advantage not only of current and upcoming customer trends, but has set its strategy on long-term growth.

Recently, I wrote an article on whether new CEO Satya Nadella was the right man to reinvigorate the innovation capabilities at Microsoft to keep them relevant as they lose market share and revenue from their core products of Windows and Office. I concluded that he had the exact leadership capabilities required, and this past week he proved me right, in stunning style.

On 27 March 2014, he held a press conference at which the new, fully touch-enabled Office for iPad was announced, and it has already proven to be one of the most popular Apps in the Apple App marketplace with more than 12 million downloads. It is free to use to view documents, but requires an Office 365 subscription to edit them. What’s interesting is that this release came before the touch-enabled version on their own Windows platform, something unheard of in previous Microsoft regimes.

Microsoft’s strategy is “Cloud First, Mobile First” – Satya Nadella

Then, at their annual Build Conference on 2 Apr 2014, he announced that all versions of Windows, including PC, tablet and phone versions, would be free for devices with a screen of less than 9 inches to consumer manufacturers, to help challenge Google’s free Android operating system for smaller devices.

What many of you may not realise is that Android device manufacturers actually have to pay a patent fee to Microsoft for some of its technologies, so it will now actually be cheaper to manufacture a Windows phone or tablet than an Android one.

Finally, it also made many of its developer tools (which programmes use to make software and apps) open-source, like it’s C# and .Net platforms, and made it easier to develop Apps between all Microsoft devices (PC, tablet, phone, Xbox). This has gained a lot of support in the developer community.

So what does it mean? Have Microsoft given up making people pay for software?

What has happened this week is one of the most radical changes to a major company’s business model in a long time.

Microsoft has just gone from a business model based primarily on selling products, licenses (IP) and devices to one selling ongoing services and subscriptions.

microsoftstrategy

Let me go through why each of these changes is so significant, and why it puts the company is a very strong position to continue being a successful innovator in the next decade (about as long as you can predict for a tech company). I would in fact argue that it puts it closer to the level of Google, and that it could surpass Apple again in that time:

1. Release of Office for iPad: Microsoft has given away a superior version of its product on a platform it doesn’t own. Previously, it had not released it to try and give customers a reason to buy it’s own tablet platform, the Surface. The new strategy shows that Microsoft is willing to enable it’s customers to access their products in the way they prefer. How does Microsoft benefit? Simple: Office 365 Subscriptions. To edit documents, you need to have a subscription to Office 365 (which is how the majority of new customers get Office on PCs now), which costs a monthly fee instead of paying hundreds of dollars up-front to own the software. This means that every iPad owner who uses Office on their device could be worth more than $100 a year to Microsoft. This is predicted to bring in billions of dollars annually as both individual users and big corporates accelerate using the service. It also enables them to interact more directly with their customers, thus achieving several of the 10 Types of Innovation.

2. Giving away Windows licenses for free on small devices: Microsoft desperately needs to catch up with both Apple and Android. Last year, for the first time more iOS devices were sold worldwide than PCs. And this has hurt the sales of Windows PCs, as people are less likely to upgrade their desktop or laptop, instead purchasing a powerful new tablet. Being able to manufacture Windows devices with small screens for free will significantly increase the number of devices on the market (especially in rapidly developing markets like China, India, Africa and South America where price is a crucial factor). It is also a factor when considering the development of wearable devices with even smaller screen sizes, where price will be an even bigger issue (although many of these will forego a full-blown operating system for more stripped-down tech, like ones based on JavaVM). However, even if there are millions of new users of Windows devices, if Microsoft doesn’t get a license, how will they benefit? Through the use of additional services on their platform, like Cloud storage (based on their Azure platform), App and media sales (much like iTunes) and encouraging them to sign up for other services like Office and Xbox Live. Not to mention the ability to target them with appropriate advertising as Google does.

Much like IBM’s change from a hardware manufacturer to a services and consulting provider over the past two decades, Microsoft’s Board Members and Leadership realised that customer expectations and competitor capabilities were shifting their traditional business model. In order to continue growing, it needed to change it’s strategy, and that required a clear vision on what the future was and their role within in. When looking for their next CEO, Microsoft’s Board Members decided that their strategy would be “Cloud First, Mobile First”, which is why they chose Satya Nadella, with his background running the “Azure” Cloud division in the company. So by the time the new CEO came on board, he already had leadership support behind the strategy.

It goes to show that one of the most fundamental capabilities for a company to achieve ongoing innovation success is leadership with not only a vision, but a strategy of innovations to get them there and a willingness to execute even if it means changing the company. Microsoft seems very well positioned, with a new focus on giving the customer what they want in the way they want it and adding value to the customers’ lives. Google is still and will continue to be a serial innovator, using its vast profit from advertising to explore new products and research projects.

It is Apple I am more concerned about. They’re still growing revenue at an astounding rate as they expand into markets like China, and have more cash reserves than most countries. But you get the feeling that their ability to push themselves with new breakthrough innovations has stalled somewhat since Steve Jobs passed away. Their fundamental business model as a designer of high-end electronics and retailer of media and apps is solid. But for long-term growth, they need to be able to adapt to what the new customers desire, and as a design firm their company ethos is around building a walled community of experiences within which everything is perfect. This could be its current strength and eventual downfall. After all, it is the most adaptable companies that innovate and survive long-term.

Do you think that Microsoft has made the right choice, or are they too far behind Google and Apple to be rescued? Let me know in the comments below, and don’t forget to get my weekly Innovation Insights newsletter along with my report on the Secrets of Ongoing Innovation Success.

image credit: microsoft.com

BETA - Global Innovation Management Institute certification
Get the latest innovation content - your way

Wait! Before you go…

Choose how you want the latest innovation content delivered to you:


Nick SkillicornNick Skillicorn is an Innovation consultant and Creativity coach in London. Find out what Improvides can do for your organisation, and get your free copy of his new book The Secrets of ongoing Innovation Success.

This entry was posted in Feature Of The Week and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Microsoft out-innovates Apple & Google

  1. Steve says:

    Two weeks in and Microsoft is victorious; Apple is doomed. It’s exactly this kind of baloney that served Microsoft so badly over the last decade. I’d award it a Thurrott.

    • Simon says:

      Wow – did you even read the article? I didn’t get the sense that any victories or defeats had been pronounced. Or do you reject it simply because it isn’t bashing Microsoft?

  2. Sandeep says:

    Great Article. Couldn’t agree more.

  3. ash says:

    MS is eventually waking up to the new digital economy, which is a good sign. How well they are able to monetize the outcome of new strategy remains to be seen. They will need to be nimbler now more than ever in order to succeed.

  4. Pingback: Innovation Excellence | Microsoft out-innovates Apple & Google | Richards Innovation Blog

  5. David Hamill says:

    There is no question in my mind that the old business was not only unsustainable but downright wrong in this new era for technologies. Coming from where Satya was, what he saw and knew, this new model makes better sense. The key will be to ensure its execution and success, and to adapt faster to emerging needs in the market. The evidence will show itself in shareholder based on customer acceptance and adoption.

  6. Erick Javier says:

    It is interesting how they change… at least they are not trying to conquer the world, as they try to do without success… at least not so evident like they try to do it before

  7. Abhishek says:

    Sounds like MS is going the Google & Apple. The strategy seems to be more aligned towards developing a service based ecosystem which is a traditional u-turn from MS product based licensing model.

    My best wishes to Satya Nadella in the tough race ahead and hope they board the innovation bus and become a leader rather than the “Me too” bus and become a follower.

  8. Ravi says:

    I believe Microsoft success depends upon their ability transform company operation as well as products into lean and agile architecture. Their innovation & Marketing strategy should focus on entire ecosystem than address each segments (enterprise, SME, Consumer, Partners etc.) in silos through platforms & devices instead of on-premise products/services. They need to measure Microsoft maturity on Collaboration culture (lean and agile), Process (Eco-system focus) & automation (DevOps & technology). Office on iOS platform( point 1) is similar to most proven models and hence it will succeed for sure. But second strategy (Giving away Windows licenses for free…) would require tweaking and time alone can prove it if it succeeds or fails.

  9. Shaun Mitchell says:

    I believe Microsoft as finally found the correct stride in the new strategy. They have all the makings of being successful in the cloud and mobile platforms, now they need to work on more alignment of their offerings, make them easier then ever and get them into peoples hands and lives. This will be the hard part, making the mobile platform free will help but also making xbox live and their other cloud services seamless will be important for end consumers. This is what Google and Apple have done well.

  10. MJ says:

    The quick turns by MSFT are showing huge positive returns I hope they keep it up.

  11. Shanika W. says:

    “Divide and conquer” might give great results in CS algorithms, but may not be the best strategy to win the OS war.

    Satya shows cooperation can trump competition – even in humans! Great and exciting move!! Finally, we can mix and match software, OS, and devices with less judgment !!!

  12. Alpeshkumar Shah says:

    I think this was needed for MS to come up with such a strategy.
    I wish all the best to Satya Nadella.

  13. I don’t think that the Microsoft does innovation. But Apple does innovation in every movements. Microsoft is trying to make a windows alternative or something like that for what apple did early. The reality is what Microsoft have best men with them and they don’t have enough ideas to utilize them. In my view 60% of Microsoft products are not that much best of all other products of it’s kind. Let’s see the example of a Mac and PC, In case if you have enough money and budget and there is no need of a specified platform for your works most of the people will not choose PC at all. That’s the problem and I don’t think that Microsoft will cover this large distance in the coming 15 years and they will stay as the second choice always… Always

  14. Sashay says:

    MS. No new model will get MS back online. There is a diff between catchup and underdog. Catchup never wins. MS is a catch up in MobileCloud Era

  15. Chris says:

    I think it is a little too late for MS. As far as I can see, this is not innovation but catch up with what Apple, IBM, Google, Amazon, etc have been doing for years. People are switching to open source, I don’t know why some people still pay to use MS Office when there are pretty solid, and better, applications available.

  16. Pingback: Innovation Excellence | Top 20 Innovation Articles – April 2014

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Keep Up to Date

  • FeedBurner
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Slideshare
  • Email
  • YouTube
  • IPhone
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Stumble Upon

IX Community Members

SIMAnswers License Error: Unable to communicate with iono

Innovation Authors - Braden Kelley, Julie Anixter and Rowan Gibson

Your hosts, Braden Kelley, Julie Anixter and Rowan Gibson, are innovation writers, speakers and strategic advisors to many of the world’s leading companies.

“Our mission is to help you achieve innovation excellence inside your own organization by making innovation resources, answers, and best practices accessible for the greater good.”