The Difference between Strategy and Innovation

Strategy and innovation are often conflated.  Recently, I even had someone say to me, “last time I checked, strategy and innovation were the same thing, is that not correct?” in a tone just like the one my 2nd grade teacher reserved for the dullards in the class.

No, it is not correct.  Not even close.  In fact, they are quite distinct, requiring vastly different people, skill sets and processes.  Try to do both at the same time and you’ll likely do none of either.  That’s a serious problem.

The conundrum is that every business needs both.  Without strategy you have no direction, without innovation you lose relevance.  They both need to be part of an integrated effort. So it is important to be clear about what each needs to succeed, where to deploy them, who should drive them and what to expect.  Here’s a guide that will set things straight.

What is Strategy?

Strategy is probably the most overused word in business.  It is often employed, unhelpfully, as a value distinction.  If something is “strategic,” then it’s well thought out, if it’s “unstrategic” then some idiot must have done it.

In reality, as I wrote in an earlier post, a strategy is a coherent and substantiated logic for making one set of choices rather than another.  In other words, it’s used to make decisions that drive action, whether that entails the overall mission of the enterprise, where it allocates resources or how it implements programs and processes.

Good strategy is clear, never confused.  At its best it’s elegant, meaning that it explains the maximum amount of variables in the fewest number of statements.  Most of all, everything strategy does is in the service of operational success.  There can never be “good strategy, but poor execution,” because assessing capabilities is a crucial component of strategy.

In Good Strategy Bad Strategy, Richard Rumelt points out that good strategy “brings relative strength to bear against relative weakness.”  I think that’s about right.

The Role of Failure

One thing that you never want a strategy to do is fail.  That’s very bad.  It means that you didn’t do your job right.  You screwed up.

Failure, on the other hand, is an integral part of innovation, which is usually neither coherent nor substantiated, but a dirty, messy business.  After all, if you knew what you were doing, it wouldn’t be innovation, it would be execution.

The practice of innovation, unlike strategy, is about possibility, not direction.  It involves a lot of fumbling around, chasing wrong ideas down blind alleys, experimenting and trying things out.  The trick is that you fail quickly and cheaply, then move onto the next idea. Eventually you’ll get to something that works.  If you can survive you can thrive.

Edison tried and failed thousands of times to invent the lightbulb before he got it right, then he sold a bunch  and made a mint.

And that’s why the difference between innovation and strategy is so important.  Strategy is a primary function of senior management.  Innovation is not and shouldn’t be.  Once they get involved, buy-in increases, costs rise and failing quickly and cheaply becomes very, very hard.

Innovation as Combination

One important aspect of innovation is combining old things in new ways.  As I noted before, breakthrough discoveries often adapt ideas from far flung contexts.

Darwin borrowed from geology and economics, Einstein from the philosopher Humean skepticism and Google transformed a practice from the academic world into a new approach to searching online.  The list goes on.

That’s because innovation is most important when you get stuck, when you’ve hit a wall and conventional wisdom is no longer so wise.  Time tested approaches begin to fail.  A new path needs to be forged.

Innocentive, an open information platform, finds that most of the solutions come from people working outside the field.  A molecular biologist, for example, might find that a problem that stumps industrial chemists is very similar to one that has long been solved in their field.  Newcomers have fresh eyes and can often bring a fresh perspective.

Of course, the best time to innovate is before you get stuck and start to lose customers. Small failures can be productive, but a big failure can kill you.  That’s why innovation and strategy have to meet up somewhere and why there is so much confusion.

The Path to Innovative Strategy

As I noted above, strategy is best when it’s simple and clear.  If something worked yesterday, it will most likely work today.  Unless you have a good reason, it’s best to go with what you know works and you can do well.

Unfortunately, that’s not always possible.  As I’ve previously written, business models don’t last very long anymore.  Technological cycles are becoming shorter than corporate decision cycles and disruption is becoming the order of the day.  That’s when innovative strategy (notice the adjective) becomes imperative.

And that’s how innovation can inform strategy and why it’s important to have an ongoing innovation effort that is separate from the overall corporate direction.  All of those failures provide useful knowledge and experience that can be combined to form a new strategy.

It is, after all, the failures of innovation that can inform the future success of strategy.

image credit:dougnewburg.com

Clearworks - Customers, Connections, Clarity

Don’t miss a post (4,400+) – Subscribe to our RSS feed and join our Innovation Excellence group!


5 Principles of InnovationGreg Satell a consultant who concentrates on media, marketing and innovation. Check out at his site, Digital Tonto and follow him on twitter @digitaltonto

This entry was posted in Innovation, People & Skills, Processes & Tools, Strategy. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to The Difference between Strategy and Innovation

  1. Pingback: Innovation Excellence | The Difference between Strategy and Innovation | Innovation & Change | Scoop.it

  2. I would argue strategy informs innovation, it is the shifts in the markets, technology, the customer that ‘informs’ and adjusts the strategy, then innovation responds (it lags). It is research and knowledge that informs both.

    Innovation leads when you are searching for a strategy and you are exploring, expermentating and you adjust (pivot)on your strategic direction but not on your goals or vision.

    It is the ability to manage the two- strategy and innovation- to reduce the lag in either

  3. Greg Satell says:

    Paul,

    I’m not sure that’s quite accurate inasmuch as innovation can inform strategy just just ans strategy can inform innovation (3M is a great example).

    It’s a very reciprocal relationship and the question of which is primary is very situational. What I think is important is the recognition that these are two very different activities which require very different competencies.

    - Greg

  4. Pingback: Articles of Interest 6/29/2012 « National Creativity Network

  5. Dark... says:

    Buen Articulo XD

  6. Greg,

    I like your reciprocal relationship a lot.That is the right point. Not sure on your meaning in the reference to 3M but working out the linkage between both is not easy for many.

  7. Pingback: Strategy and Innovation --- AdaptableOrg.com

  8. Pingback: Strategy and Innovation -- AdaptableOrg.com

  9. Pingback: Planning (Resource Fluidity) EC 6/29/12-AdaptableOrg.com

  10. Important points. When I’m out talking to businesses I often see a real misunderstanding of what is truly innovative, with businesses telling me they differentiate themselves by having the best people or superior customer service, when that alone is never enough. Strategy, particularly in the last few years, has simply been about cutting costs. At the same time, truly innovative businesses have been able to expand market share, even in the downturn. I’ve often said that what Steve Jobs did that was even more innovative than his tech, was to sell cool to geeks. And we were willing to pay a premium to be the cool kids, for once.

  11. Pingback: Innovation Excellence | The Difference between Strategy and Innovation - Greg Satell | Business Model Engineering | Scoop.it

  12. Pingback: Innovation Excellence | The Difference between Strategy and Innovation | Management Innovation | Scoop.it

  13. Pingback: Product Management | Pearltrees

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Keep Up to Date

  • FeedBurner
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Slideshare
  • Email
  • YouTube
  • IPhone
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Stumble Upon

Innovation Authors - Braden Kelley, Julie Anixter and Rowan Gibson

Your hosts, Braden Kelley, Julie Anixter and Rowan Gibson, are innovation writers, speakers and strategic advisors to many of the world’s leading companies.

“Our mission is to help you achieve innovation excellence inside your own organization by making innovation resources, answers, and best practices accessible for the greater good.”